Microphone in a bubble...

This is the place for any magazine-related discussions that don't fit in any of the column discussion boards below.
Post Reply
User avatar
Externet
Posts: 1826
Joined: Fri Feb 01, 2002 1:01 am
Location: Mideast USA
Contact:

Microphone in a bubble...

Post by Externet » Wed Nov 07, 2018 12:56 pm

Hi.
What material would be less detrimental to fidelity for an electret microphone enclosed behind/inside a waterproof, corrosion proof membrane ?
A rigid bubble, a flexible bubble, a silicone, a plastic, a metal, a cellophane, a rubber, a deflated bubble, an inflated one... ?
- Abolish the deciBel ! -

dyarker
Posts: 1706
Joined: Fri Aug 22, 2003 1:01 am
Location: Izmir, Turkiye; from Rochester, NY
Contact:

Re: Microphone in a bubble...

Post by dyarker » Wed Nov 07, 2018 3:12 pm

Not a truely rigid bubble. Sound (higher and lower preasure) on the outside needs to deform/flex to make higher and lower presure in the air inside.

Same for "Gummy Bear" soft, except sound is absorbed, nothing inside to vibrate the mic element.
Dale Y

User avatar
haklesup
Posts: 2933
Joined: Thu Aug 01, 2002 1:01 am
Location: San Jose CA
Contact:

Re: Microphone in a bubble...

Post by haklesup » Thu Nov 08, 2018 11:17 am

All of those materials would impede sound waves and attenuate the sound somewhere along the spectrum. Even considering an idealized flexible membrane, you now have 2 air masses coupling through the membrane with one being much much smaller than the other. Since air on both sides is compressible, no membrane is ideal and other factors such as temperature may vary, this should not be a high fidelity setup.

On the other hand, any of those setups could make an interesting guitar effects pickup or unique voice distortion for a musician. Filling the inner volume with more or less dense than air gasses would be interesting too. Most Distortion is done electronically now however AFAIK

dyarker
Posts: 1706
Joined: Fri Aug 22, 2003 1:01 am
Location: Izmir, Turkiye; from Rochester, NY
Contact:

Re: Microphone in a bubble...

Post by dyarker » Thu Nov 08, 2018 12:33 pm

Oh yeah! How waterproof? Rain/spit/sweat? Or, submerged? (and depth?)
Dale Y

User avatar
haklesup
Posts: 2933
Joined: Thu Aug 01, 2002 1:01 am
Location: San Jose CA
Contact:

Re: Microphone in a bubble...

Post by haklesup » Fri Nov 09, 2018 11:52 am

an electret mic is not the highest fidelity options on todays market anyway. Its handy because it can be used with Voltage boas rather than current bias. Most of these could probably be waterproofed by simply putting tape over the sound port and sealing the electrical contacts in epoxy. They may already be somewhat weather resistant because I think you can just shake out the water and air dry the case, the sensor is already a sealed membrane construction. (image search "electret mic construction")

User avatar
Lenp
Posts: 1371
Joined: Thu Oct 26, 2006 8:11 pm
Location: Maryland
Contact:

Re: Microphone in a bubble...

Post by Lenp » Fri Nov 09, 2018 6:08 pm

Do I see into the future, a Sulfur hexafluoride and Helium gas mixing system, putting gasses into a acoustic chamber for the next generation of guitar adulteration?
Len

“To invent, you need a good imagination and a big pile of junk.” (T. Edison)
"I must be on the way to success since I already have the junk". (Me)

User avatar
Externet
Posts: 1826
Joined: Fri Feb 01, 2002 1:01 am
Location: Mideast USA
Contact:

Re: Microphone in a bubble...

Post by Externet » Sat Nov 10, 2018 7:10 am

haklesup wrote:
Fri Nov 09, 2018 11:52 am
an electret mic is not the highest fidelity options on todays market anyway. Its handy because it can be used with Voltage boas rather than current bias. Most of these could probably be waterproofed by simply putting tape over the sound port and sealing the electrical contacts in epoxy. They may already be somewhat weather resistant because I think you can just shake out the water and air dry the case, the sensor is already a sealed membrane construction. (image search "electret mic construction")
Thanks, haklesup.
The "fidelity" word included in the original materials search post as to avoid introducing distortion from a proper material wrapping/encapsulating. For voice-only use range, does not need 'high fidelity'
Tape waterproofing does not work, muffles it, and as the type of microphone is vented in the back and electrets are very corrosion-prone. Shaking it dry is not applicable; as soon as corrosive liquids are present, its life days are counting, fast.
- No guitar adulteration applications :smile:
Exploring a sealed wrap forming a rigid/thin bubble with thin cellophane (as cigarette pack wrapper) to pass vibrations... I bought silicone condoms too for testing :shock:
Latex water balloons smell like too resilient material, and degrade. tested iffy.
Evaluating/comparing more materials is next...



.
- Abolish the deciBel ! -

User avatar
evahle
Posts: 186
Joined: Mon Aug 13, 2007 3:48 am
Contact:

Re: Microphone in a bubble...

Post by evahle » Sun Nov 11, 2018 9:22 am

Myself, I'd setup a test station with the microphone to be tested, and an amp capable of 20-20khz output to a scope.
The mic would be setup to accept the material to be tested, and easily changed to any material I'd want to test it with.
Then I'd have a sound sweep generator with speaker in front of the mic.
I'd then chart the results on a spreadsheet, with the type of material tested, as well as the frequency response.

Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 9 guests