why infra-red and not visible led?

This is the place for any magazine-related discussions that don't fit in any of the column discussion boards below.
Post Reply
User avatar
dr_when
Posts: 208
Joined: Thu Oct 28, 2004 1:01 am
Location: Milwaukee
Contact:

why infra-red and not visible led?

Post by dr_when »

Hi,

Someone threw this question at me and I could not come up with a definitive answer off the top of my head. They asked "why are almost all optical sensors, like photo interrupters, etc made with infra-red Leds and not visible (red) leds"?

My thinking was maybe less interference from ambient light...at least artificial ambient light. Sunlight is another story. Are the phototransistors typically more sensitive to IR or is that strictly based on specs i.e. some are and some aren't. I guess I am mostly sticking to the "less interference by artificial ambient light" as the primary reason. Any thoughts?

Bob
"Who is John Galt?"
User avatar
sofaspud
Posts: 531
Joined: Wed Feb 13, 2002 1:01 am
Location: San Antonio, TX
Contact:

Re: why infra-red and not visible led?

Post by sofaspud »

The only two reasonable answers I could come up with are 1) the ambient light theory and 2) it is easier/cheaper to achieve
a wavelength match in the infrared spectrum. The first just seems sensible, the second is more semiconductor implantation
physics that I've never really looked into. I wonder what wavelength the common optoisolators (i.e. 4N25) use? Never looked
into that either, but it could provide a clue.
User avatar
MrAl
Posts: 3862
Joined: Fri Jan 11, 2002 1:01 am
Location: NewJersey
Contact:

Re: why infra-red and not visible led?

Post by MrAl »

Hi,

There is also the chance that they dont want anyone to see the beam or what it strikes
or even where it strikes.
LEDs vs Bulbs, LEDs are winning.
User avatar
CeaSaR
Posts: 1949
Joined: Sat Nov 08, 2003 1:01 am
Location: Phoenixville, PA USA
Contact:

Re: why infra-red and not visible led?

Post by CeaSaR »

Found the answer!
http://www.scte.org/documents/pdf/Issue%203-04.pdf
Page 3 explains it all.
Another possibility lies in paraqgraph 2 of http://www.everything2.com/?node_id=1931530.

Yahoo! search comes through again.

CeaSaR
Hey, what do I know?
User avatar
sofaspud
Posts: 531
Joined: Wed Feb 13, 2002 1:01 am
Location: San Antonio, TX
Contact:

Re: why infra-red and not visible led?

Post by sofaspud »

I took a look at the 4N25 datasheet; it does indeed operate in the IR region. Curiosity then got the better of me. From
what I could come up with, infrared is used because it optimizes photosensitivity (e.g. wavelength matching, response
time, and all that good etc. stuff). This 'Use Of Phototransistors' paper states, "A key fact to remember in using
phototransistors is that all phototransistors are most sensitive in the infrared region and thus work best with infrared
emitting diodes (IRED). There is no requirement that the wavelength of the IRED exactly coincide with the
phototransistor peak response wavelength but the response factor for any deviation should be known and accounted
for in the design."
Close enough for definitive?
User avatar
dr_when
Posts: 208
Joined: Thu Oct 28, 2004 1:01 am
Location: Milwaukee
Contact:

Re: why infra-red and not visible led?

Post by dr_when »

Thanks guys. I can see that in some sensor applications where the sensor is visible that red leds may not be preferred because they can be seen. I suspected the IR was better suited for the phototransistors but I don't think that is a real problem. I guess in the application that I am looking at aesthetics is one thing and really have to test the operation in different ambient light settings.
"Who is John Galt?"
Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 21 guests